२३१. किञ्च विश्धसत्यत्वानुवाद इति वदता विश्वस्य प्रामाणिकता भ्युपेयते ? न वा ? २३२. नाव: ; तत्प्रमाणाविरोधात् । निषेध्यस्य स्वेन प्रमाणा विषयतानभ्युपगमाञ्च । २३३. न द्वितीयः ; असिद्धस्यानुवादायोगात् । लोकसिद्धानुवाद इति चेन्न ; लोके च प्रमाणसिद्धमनूद्यते ? भ्रान्त्या वा २३४ . नाद्यः, दत्तोत्तरत्वात्; नोत्तरः, तथैव लोकस्य भ्रान्ति सिद्धब्रह्मसद्भावो निषिद्धयते इति प्रसङ्गात् । 231. Further, by him who says that there is repetition of th५ : reality of the world, is the world admitted as an object of valid cognition or not ? 232 . Not the first, because of conflict with that authority (for statements like * There are no differents etc.), arrd because of the fact that that which is [1egated is 10t admitted (by you Advaitin) to be by its own nature the content of valid cognition. 233. Not the second, because restatement of that which is 10t established is impossible. If it be said that there is restatement of what is established iाः ordinary experience, th७ (says the siddhantin). Is it the ordinary experience or delusively ? 234. Not the first, because of the reply having been already given. , Not the latter, because in the 5ame way there is the contingence of the refutation of Brahman-reality delusively cognised in the case of the world
