६३. न द्वितीयः ; ब्रह्मणोऽपि मिथ्यात्वापातात् । ६४. प्रमाणाविषयत्वे प्रपञ्चस्य तत्पक्षीकरणायोगाच । ६५. अतत्वावेदकप्रत्यक्षादिसिद्धतया पक्षीकरणमुपपन्नमिति चेन्न ; प्रत्यक्षादेरतत्वावेदकत्वे मानाभावात् । ६. विषयस्यासत्वादेव तत्सिद्धिरिति चेत्--तदेव कुतः ? ६७ . किञ्चातत्वाचेदकं प्रमाणं चेति व्याघातः । ६८. अतत्त्वावेदकं प्रमाणं चेत्-शुक्तिरजतज्ञानमपि प्रमाणं [32 63. वादावली Not the seco11d, because 64. A1d (it is also 50) because, if the universe be 10t an object of any means of valid knowledge, there is the impossibility of making that (universe) the subject (in a sy]logisाm) 65. If it be said that it is intelligible to make that the subject as established by perception, etc., which make known the non-real, no (says the siddhanti7), because there is no authority (to the effect) that perception, etc., of the contingence 6. (If the Advaitin conternds) that it (the cog॥i- tion of non-real objects by perceptio7) is established eve1 because of the unreality of the content, whence is this (the unreality of the objects) itself (known) ? 67. Further, there is contradiction in (the state ment) that (perception) makes known the non-real and is (yet) a means of valid knowledge. 68. If that which makes known the non-reall be a means of valid knowledge, then, why should not the
