५९. द्वितीये वक्तव्यम्-कोऽयं निषेधः? अभाववेदनम्, सद्वि विक्तत्ववेदनं वा ? ६०. निरूपणात् । ६२ . ६१. न चतुर्थः; विचारागोचरत्वात् । तथाहि-प्रमाणाविषयत्वं नाम यत्किञ्चित्प्रमाणाविषयत्वं वा ? प्रमाणमात्राविषयत्वं वा ? नाद्यः; अत्यन्तासत्वापातात् । न द्वितीयः ; तस्यैवाद्याप्य त्रादावली नाद्य: ; गन्धादेः श्रोत्राद्यविषयतासिध्या सिद्धसाधनत्वात् । 59. In the second case, it has to be said, “ what is this negatiox1 ?' Is it cognition of non-existence, or cognition of being other than rea1 ? 60. Not the first, because of the contingence of absolute unreality . Not the second, because that itself (being other than the real) is still unexplained (0 61. Not the fourth, because it is beyond the sphere of inguiry. It is thus. The term3 * not being the object of a means of valid' knowledge', does it mean “ not being the object of some 01e mea11s of valid knowledge or “ not being the object of means of valid knowledge in general ' ? 62. Not the first, because of (the defect) of the establishment of the established through the establish 1anent (of the fact) of odour etc. being not the object of the s01se of hearing etc. " [X
