११२ ४०३. न द्वितीय: ; व्याप्तिवैकल्यात् । तृतीयेऽपि सापेक्षतामात्रं निवर्त्तताम् ; दर्शनस्य किमायातम् ? ४०४. प्रकारान्तरासम्भवात् स्वयमपि निवर्तते इति चेन्न; प्रका रान्तरेण निर्वाहकल्पनस्य शक्यत्वेन प्रतीतेरपह्नवायोगात् । अन्यथा स्वाभिल षितस्याप्यभेदस्यासिद्धेरुक्तत्वात् । ४०५. इयश्चात्र दर्शनस्थितिः--न भेदो युगधर्मः, किन्त्वेकस्य धर्मोऽपरेण निरूप्यः । 403. Not the second, because of the defect in respect of the pervasion (which is not established, thcre being 10 example). In the third case als0,1et the dependence alone disappear ; what (defect) (occurs to the cognition (of difference) ? 404 . If it be said that, because of the 101-exist ence of another mode (of arising) that (cognition of difference) t00 disappears, 10 (says the Advaitin), because it beirpg possible to ass117e 1710de , another of explanation, the denial of the cognition (of difference) is 10t reasonable; for it has been said that otherwise ever the 101-difference cherished by (the opponent) himself would be non-established XL 405. A11d this is the position of .the system in this 17atter, Difference is not a common. attribute . It is rather the attribute of one (object) indicated by
