वादावली ४०. नापि परप्रसिद्धया परबोधनम् , परस्य स्वक्रियास्वन्याय विरुद्धविकल्पसाधुत्वाप्रसिद्धचा बोधयितुमशक्थत्वात् । ४० १. कथश्चात्रापादनक्रमः ? यदि भेददर्शनं स्यात्, तदा अन्यो न्याश्रयादिकं स्थात् ; यदि भेददर्शनं वास्तवं स्यात्, तदा अन्योन्याश्रयादिकं स्यादिति वा ? यदि भेददर्शनं धम्र्यादिसापेक्ष स्यात्तहति वा ४०२. नाद्य: ; यदि भेददर्शनं न स्यात्तर्हि सकलव्यवहारविधुर परः प्रसज्यतेति प्रतिर्कपराहतत्वात् । १११ 400. Nor is it instruction of the opponent through what is established for the opponent; for there is 10 possibility of teaching the opponent because of the soundness of the alternatives not being established (for hium) in as much as they are unreasonable and conflict | * 401. What is the form of deduction (of the defect) here ? Is it that if there be the cognition of difference, then, there would be (defects like) recipr० cal dependence, etc., or that if the cognition of difference be true, there would be (defects like) recipro cal dependence, etc., or that if the cognition of dif. ference be dependent on the (cognition of) the sub strate, etc., the1, (there would be the defect of recipro cal dependence) ? 402 . Not the first, for, there is the refutation by the following. counter argument, against it, * If there were no cognition of difference, then there is the continge11ce of the opponent being devoid of a]] empirical usage
