२९९. सत्त्वमात्रं निषिध्यते, नासत्त्वमापाद्यते इति चेन्न ; तन्निषेधे तद्वौव्यात् । सत्त्वनिषेधे चैतत्तन्तुनिष्ठपदवैयथ्र्यम् । ३००. न च सिद्धसाधनतापरिहारार्थ विशेषणमिति वक्तव्यम् । एतत्पटात्यन्ताभावस्यास्माकमसिद्धेः । एतेन दृष्टान्तोऽपि साध्यविकलतया प्रत्युक्तो वेदितव्यः । ३०१. ननु पटान्तरस्यात्यन्ताभावो न चेत्, पटः किं न स्यात् ? किमत्र पटसंसर्गः स्यात्पटो वा ? ३०२ . आद्ये व्यास्यसिद्धिः । द्वितीये सिद्धसाधनम् । 299. If it be said that reality alone is dermied, but that 17reality is not adduced, it is not so (says the siddhāntin) ; for, when that (reality) is denied there is stability for that (unreality). And if reality be demied, there would be th0 futility of the words * present in 300 . Nor may it be said that the attribute is (used) to remove (the defect of) the establishment of the establish(ed ; for th1c absolute morn-existence of this cloth is not established for us (the Dvaitins). By this, the example to० is to be understood to have been refuted as dcvoid of the probandum 3011 . Now, (asks the objector) if (७f another cloth there is no absolute non-existence (in these threads), then why should not that other cloth exist (there)? Here, (asks the siddhantin), would there be the relatio1 ship with the cloth, or the cloth (itself) ?० 302 . In the first case, there is 10 establishment of the pervasion. In the second case, there is (the defest.of) the establishment of the established
- .
