१८ - मूलमध्यमककारिका 789 gece ? Fast 8171875 187 pat utayacaq CETAT 75560 f4 869 91 81991 ISTIT 4477 37847 placa gepy etett F1713 72519 07175 tot 67 8171 frequ73 77951697 gale- ofat og FECU 9179 911 opirati 978 96*13, 6511 998 af Batan 9707047 CAS ESICAT 751afero fagafa5278 ! gut gee 059 913172519 atea 731 784 TECT all the toata 47: ***1733 Fitta 447869 73542as facatat $691 9047 za sa caatst 98 TG 45 GEOT 979 al gepy grate to fall sta ay pa, COTCPS 579 175 Foto 9779 a 118|| Explanatory Translation :-The view of the opponent that Raga and Rakta originate simultaneously and exist in the same Citta has been refuted. Now the question is- whether Raga and Rakta are same or different. If Raga and Rakta are admitted as the same thing, then their co- existence cannot be proved. because co-existence is possible in case of more than one object. Unless the objects are different how can the co-existence be possible ? One never states that a pot co-exists with itself. Moreover the term 'Saha' signifies assemblage of several objects. If on the other hand Raga and Rakta are regarded as different from one another, in that case also their co-existence cannot be proved, because we are to say that their co-existence arises out of their separate existence. But separateness (Prth- aktva) cannot be regarded as the (avyabhicarita) cause of co-existence. Light and darkness, cow and buffalo are different from one another but their co-existence cannot be always accepted as a rule. So co-existence cannot be proved through separateness as a cause, In the case of light and darkness on the otherhand, separateness as a cause will contradict co-existence. Thus it is clear that co-exist- ence of Raga and Rakta cannot be proved either in the identity or in difference of Raga and Rakta. 114||| न हि पृथग्भूतयोरालोकान्धकारयोः संसारनिर्वाणयोर्वा सहभावो दृष्ट इति ।
