गुणसाधारण्यश्रुतेच्च ॥ ६२ ॥
प्रकृतोपासनस्यैव "ओमित्याश्रावयत्योमिति शंसत्योमित्युद्गायति" इति सर्वत्र संचरतः प्रणवस्य गुणत्वेनोपासनस्यापि संचारादुपासनोपादननियमो गम्यते | अतः पूर्वोक्तोपादानानेियमो न संभवतेि ॥
न वा तत्सहभावाश्रुतेः ॥ ६३ ॥
नैतत्, अङ्गभावाश्रुतेः । अङ्गभावो हि सहभावः । "यदेव विद्यया करोति तदेव वीर्यवतरम्" इति फलान्तरसाधनतयावगतस्योपासनस्याङ्ग-
stated that the Udgitha must be rectified by another priest if it is sung without the meditation. Therefore it proves that the meditation is a constituent element of the sacrificial performance.
62. GunasaadhaaranyasruteScha
And on account of there being the scriptural texts, in which the secondary thing is stated to be common in all the cases. 'With Om induces, with Om recites, with Om sings loudly' (Chand. 1-1-9). Thus the Pranava is used in the cases. Therefore the "Upasana" also must continue in all the cases invariably. Therefore it is not proper to hold that there is no necessity to connect the meditation with the sacrifices as state above.
63. Na vaa tatsahabhaavaaSruteh
It is not that; because the text does not declare their going together. This is not so; because there are no texts to show that they constitute the limbs. Indeed the term 'going-together',means 'being the limbs'. From the following text it is understood that the meditation has a separate fruit--'What
