वादावली २२५. विश्धं सत्यमित्याद्यागमविरोधश्च । व्यावहारिकं सत्त्वम त्रोच्यते इति चेन्न ; निर्बीजत्वात्कल्पनायाः । २२६. व्यर्थ च प्रपञ्चे व्यावहारिकसत्यत्वप्रतिपादनम् । न हि कश्चिलौकिको वैदिको वा व्यावहारिकसत्यतां प्रपञ्चे नाभ्युपैति । २२७. तस्माद्वादिप्रसिद्धमिथ्यात्वनिषेधेन पारमार्थिकसत्कमेव प्रति पाद्यते, * अप्रासे शास्रमर्थवत्' इति न्यायात् । २२८. “ नेह नाना ' इत्यादिश्रतिनिषेध्यसमर्पकतयानुवदति (of the probams) in respect of the knowledge giver1 rise t० by statements like "existence, knowledge, etc.' X 225. Besides, there is contradiction with scriptur al statements like the world is real', etc. If it be said that phenome1al reality (al01e) is predicated here, m0 (says the siddhantin), because the assumption is 226. And it is futile to predicate phenomenal reality with reference to the world. Nobody, whether worldly (wise) or (learned) in the vedas, fails to accept the phenomenal reality of the world. 227. Therefore there is predicated only moumemal reality through the refutation of illus0rimess well-known to the opponent (the Advaitin), because of the principle that scripture is purportful with reference to what is not established (otherwise ) 228. If it be said that the statement of the reality of the universe is a repetition (of what is otherwise
