३. मैवम्; मिथ्यात्वानिरुक्तः । तत् किमनिर्वचनीयत्वं वा ? असत्वं वा ? सद्विविक्तत्वं वा ? प्रमाणाविषयत्वं वा ? अप्रमाणविषयत्वं वा ? अविद्यातत्कार्ययोरन्यतरत्वं वा ? स्वात्यन्ताभावसमानाधिकरणतया प्रतीयमा नत्व का ? वादावली ४. नाद्यः; विकल्पासहत्वात् । तथाहि-अनिर्वचनीयत्वं किं निर्वचनविरहो वा ? निर्वाच्यविरहो वा (the world) is illusory, because it is cognisable, because it is imert and because it is finite, like the shell-silver ? 3. (The siddhāntin replies) It is not so, for, the illusoriness (referred to) is undefined. (The siddhāntin) examines each in detail) (1) Is it (.८., illus0rimess) in determinability, (2) or unreality, (3) or difference from the rea1, (4) or 10t being the content of valid cogni tion, (5) or being th७ content of invalid cognition, (6) or being either mescience or a product thereof, (7) (or being cognised as in apposition with its own 4. (The siddhāntin replies that not one of the alternatives is tenable)• Not the first, since it cannot stand analysis. It is thus; is 'being indeterminable ', e५uivalent to not having determination, or not having that which is determinable?
