परमात्मप्रतियोगिको वा भेदोऽत्र साध्यः । बन्धप्रध्वंसाधिकरणत्वञ्च मुक्तत्व मिति न परमात्मनि व्यभिचारः । ५०३. किञ्च मुक्तामुक्तयोभेदाभावे मुक्तस्य संसारः, संसारिणो वा मुक्तत्वं स्यात् । ५०४. क्यमापाच्चत ? उत संसारानुभवः ? ५०५. १४५ ननु मुक्तस्य संसारः स्यादिति किं संसाराधिकरणस्वरूपेणै 10 pot is the example. (Or the probandum here is the difference which has the supreme self (Para.matman) for its counter-correlate. And there is no inconsta1cy (f the probans) in respect of the supreme self, because to be released is to be the substrate of the posterior Inon-existence of worldly bondage (sa1iौsara) 503, [3esides, if there be no diffcrc1ce betweer the released 71d the 101-released, then there w()uld be worldly bondage for the released or releasedncss for the pr1e iIn worldly b011dage. 504 . Now (in the statement), “ there would be worldly bondage for the released ', is there deduced the identity of existence (swartpa) with the substrate of worldly bondage, (or the experience of worldly boundage ? . 505. Not the first, because it is deducing the desirable, and because there is hon-difference between the (conclusion) deduced art the ground of deduction. नाद्यः ; इष्टापादनात् । अपाद्यापादकयोभेदाभावाच ।
