१३८ वादावली ४८३. किञ्च धर्मित्वहेतुना तत्वावेदकप्रमाणवेद्यता च कुतो नृ भेदस्य स्यात् ? ४८४. न चात्मनि धर्माभावः, आनन्दो विषयानुभवो नित्यत्वं चेति सन्ति धर्मा इत्यभ्युपगमात् । न परमार्थतो धर्मा इति चेन्न; नित्य त्वाद्यभावेऽनित्यत्वाद्यापातातू ; तत्पक्षे पारमार्थिकस्यैव साधनाङ्गतानियमा भावान् । ४८५. चन्द्रभेदे धर्मित्वहेतोव्यभिचार इति चेत्-कोऽर्थः ? चन्द्रभेदमात्राभाव इति वा, चन्द्राञ्चन्द्रभेदाभाव इति वा । 483. Further why should not difference be the (object of cognition by a means of valid k70wledge maki1g knowIn the reality, because of the probars,
- possessing an attribute ' ?
484. Nor is it that in the self there is 10 attri bute : for it is admitted that there exist attributes iश., bliss, (experience of objects and eternality. If it be said that they are not attributes in absolute reality, m० (says the siddhantin), because of the contingence of non-eternality etc., in the non-existence of eternality etc., also because, according to that position, there is 10 restriction (to the effect) that only the absolutely real can serve as probarns 485. If it be said that there is inconstancy of the probarns “ possessing an attribute in respect of the difference in m10 1s, what does this mear1 ? Is it the non-existence of (all) difference as such from the moon (.e., difference from non-imposed moon as well as
