४२९. वादावली १२१ अत एव न द्वितीयः । नापि तृतीयः, सर्वत्र ज्ञाने तदभावात् । ४३०. चतुर्थस्तु, सुखादिज्ञानेष्वसम्भावितः । ज्ञानमात्रसंवादेन च प्रामाण्याभ्युपगमे धारावाहेिकविभ्रमो नाम न स्यात् । यथार्थज्ञानसंवादा युपगमे च तस्यापि याथाथ्यवधारणायामनवस्था स्यात् । ४३१. न पञ्चमः ; अनुपसञ्जातबाधभ्रमेष्वपि प्रामाण्यनिश्चया पातात्, पुरुषदेशकालविशेषविकल्पानुपपत्तेश्च । there is the counti१gence of (the detect of) reciprocal dependence 429. For the same reason (it can) not (be) the second. Nor even the third, because that does not exist in all cognitions. 430. As for the fourth however, it is not possible in respect of the cognition of pleasure, etc. And if validity be accepted because of the agreement with cognition as such (10t valid cognition), there twould not be what s called a continuous stream of delusive cogniti And if what is accepted be agreement with a valid cognition , in ascertaining the validity of that (cognition) t0, there would be (the defect of) infinite 431. Not the fth, because there is the countingence of ascertainment of validity even in respect of delusions for which a sublation has 10t yet ariserm, and because there is unintelligibility on the, analysis (of the alter [natives in respect) of such details as person, place, time, etc.
