वादावली ३९१ . नाद्यः; साधकत्वात् । द्वितीयेऽपि तदन्यः तद्विरोधी तद भावो वा नजर्थो वाच्यः । ३९२ . पक्षत्रयेऽपि दुष्परिहरो भेदः । भेदाभावप्राहिणापि प्रति योगिविलक्षणतया स्वविषयो व्यवस्थाप्यः । ३९३. नापि तृतीय: ; अविरोधादेव बाधकत्वायोगात् । ३९४. किञ्च नायं भेद इति वा, नास्त्यत्र भेद इति वा, अन्यदेव भेदात्मना प्रत्यभादिति वा, बाधकज्ञानेन भवितव्यम्; नेदं रजतं इत्यादिवत् । ३९५. तदेतत्सर्वथा भेदावगाहीति कथं तत्परिपन्थिभावमाकलयेत् । १०९ 391. Not the first, because it would establish (difference). In the second case t00, the negative particle must be stated to mean what is different from it, or what is opposed to it, or what is its non-existence. 392 . In all the three positions difference cannot be avoided. Even by one who apprehends the 101 content of his own (cognition) as different from the counter-correlate. 393 . Not the third, since even because of non conflict sublatership is not possible. 394. Again , “ this is not difference ; “ there is "mo difference here'; * some other thing itself is Imanifest as of the nature of difference': such must be the form of the sublating cognition, like the state 1ent * this is not silver, etc. , 395. Since this i7 every way comprehends differ ence, how ca11 it take on a nature inimica11 theret0 ? {
