३११ , अथ तत्रागमविरोधः, तरूपित्वमपि तस्यागमसिद्धमेव, नानुमानादिति । तस्मात्कालातीततादोषं कचित्स्वीकुर्वतात्रापि समानन्याय तया सा चाभ्युपेयैव । ३१२. किञ्च जगतो मिथ्यात्वाभावे न बाधकं पश्यामः । सत्यत्वे कथं प्रकाशेत । न तावत्स्वत :, जडत्वात् । नापि परतः, प्रकाशान्तरेण सम्बन्धाभावात् । असम्बद्धस्य प्रकाशनेऽतिप्रसङ्गात् । is devoid (f sme]], or because it is devoid of touch ? Not any one of the three, since even from this (proba1s) there is the contigence of demying (the guality of) $0und (in respect of the ether) 311. If (therm) there is contradiction (for the in ference that establishes the fact that sky is not. the abode of sound) by scripture, then its colourlessness t00 certain]y results from socripture, not from inference And th1erefore by (him1) who accepts the defect (of adducing (the probams) 1after the apse of the (proper) time (.8. Sublation), in some place, that (defect) must Imecessarily be accepted here too (in the present case) by parity of reasoning. 312. Besides, we (the Dwaitins) do not know of any sublater in (accepting) the non-existence of the i!!uscoriness of •the universe. If real, b0)yw cam it be Imanifest ? • Not by its ow I self, because it is imert ; nor by another, because there is no1-existence of relation with another manifestor. If what is non-relate८-(to a
