वादावली ७३ २६८. तो नेदं जगद्भांतिकल्पितमिति तर्कपराहतं दृश्यत्वानु मनम् २६९. किश्च कल्पनाया आरोप्यसदृशाधिष्ठानप्रधानपूर्वकत्वं व्या पकम् । तचात्र नास्ति । सत्यजगद्वयाङ्गीकारादस्यैव जगतः सत्यत्वाङ्गी कारस्य लघुत्वात् । अतो व्याप्यकल्पनापि नास्तीति प्रमाणविरोधः । २७०. तथा च प्रयोग :–प्रपञ्चो न भ्रान्तिकल्पितः, निरधिष्ठा नत्वान्निष्प्रधानत्वादात्मवद्वयतिरेकेण वा रजतवत् । विपक्षे त्वारोप्यसदृशा धिष्ठानप्रधानभूतसत्यजगद्वयाङ्गीरप्रसङ्गो बाधकः । 268 . Therefore, the universe is not posited as delusive, (and) hence the inference through cognisabil ity, etc., (as probarns) is refuted by counter-arguments 269. Further, for assumptiveness, there is a per vadler, tr४., being preceded by a substrate and archetype that are similar to the super-imposed. And they (the substrate and the archetype) do not exist here (in the subject). For, it is more consistent with parssimony to admit the reality of this universe than to admit t५0 real universes. Therefore ever the pervaded 52. as sumptiveness does not exist ; hence, there is confict with the means of valid knowledge. 270. And there is the sy]]ogism thus : * The universe is not delusively posited, because it has 1either a substrate mor an archetype, like the self; or negatively like the silver (cognised in the'shell-silver delusion).' (On the contrary view, there is the sublater in the form of the contingence of the admission of two reali
