Moreover of the validity and invalidity of the statement. “there is 10 tattva at a]]' there is contradic tion. [This is the meaning :- If it be said there is no being itself a tatu0 would be contradicted by the state 171ent, “there is 10 tatu4 at all'. R.T. ] If tat00 were one only then there would be the opposition (to such a view) of experienced variety (in the form 'this is a p00t', 'this is a . 17an' and so 011 ) This experience cannot be discarded as illusory without some contradicting experience. This view (that there is only one tatud) is refuted (in detail) elsewhere (in 7atu07i74ay0 and other places) Again it cannot be said that every category is self: dependent for this is opposed to known dependence This view also implies eternal happiness (and eternal freedom from misery) for all (and this is not found to be the case). It cannot be said that tat00 is dependent only for this would land us in infinite regress and impossibility with the result that there can be m0 being (sorta) and the like, for anything. Also there will be disagreement with scripture [A1 ordinary conscious beings, every moment of their existence, experience a sense of dependence; their desires more ofter than 10t are unrealised. their at tempts frustrated. On whom do they ultimately depend? He cannot be a dependent being; for that dependent being must depend on another, that on another and s0 on, ad iोgfrit47. So it is impossible that the limit of this dependence is a dependent being. To account for the world of beings wh0 exist, act and become known
