पृष्ठम्:हम्मीरमहाकाव्यम्.pdf/८

विकिस्रोतः तः
पुटमेतत् सुपुष्टितम्

10

Hindu monarch, who nobly replied that the sun would sooner rise in the west, and Sumoru be levelled with the earth, than he would break his plighted faith to the unfortunate refugee. The siege of Raņathambore was immediately commenced, and the fort was at length captured, but the heroic Hammira fell in its defence; and the females of his family, determining not to survive him, perished on the funeral pile.” This history of Hammira supplies some information which the sentimental and enthusiastic annalist, of Råjasthån would have gladly interwoven into the pages of his work, and which sheds fresh light on the eventful period in which the hero lived.

 The Hammâra Mahākāvya is divided into fourteen cantos, of which the first four are concerned with the hero's ancestors-the Chohans, many of whom wore paramount lords of India. 'The empire belongs to the Chohán' is an admitted Indian historical fiction, and the mere mention of the names of the old kings, many of whom were the lords paramount of India, accompanied as it is with much poetical nonsense, carries our knowledge of them a step further than the researches of Colonels Wilford and Ted.

 The narrative is, all through, very uneven. "The genealogy of the Chohans, as given in the first three chapters, though with some more names than are to be found in Ted's list, cannot be regarded as satisfactory. The author really knew nothing more about the ancient kings of the race ; the names are simply brought in to give him opportunities of displaying his power for poetical conceits, and thus the accounts of the princes about whom he had no-historical information are filled with fanciful Conceptions, in which some of the natural phenomena are explained with admirable contempt of the teachings of the “proud philosophy” of Nature. From Prithvirâja Chohần to the death of Hammira the narrative is fairly historic; but the author now and then even here, relapses into rhapsody which amounts to a confession of his ignorance of the historical facts of the reign in hand.