एवं चात्माकार्त्स्न्यम् ॥ ३२ ॥
आत्मनः शरीरपरिमाणत्वे बृहतः शरीरादल्पीयसि प्रविशतोऽकार्त्स्न्यम् वेिकलत्वं प्रसज्येत ॥
न च पर्यायादप्यविरोधो विकारादिभ्यः ॥ ३३ ॥
^तथा संकोचविकासावस्थायोगादपि नाविरोधः, घटादिवद्विकारादेियोगप्रसक्तेः ॥
the former is the object of production and destruction and the latter is on reverse. Therefore these two attributes cannot pertain to a single thing.
32. Evam caatmaakaartsnyam
And thus the non-entireness of the self.
Suppose the self is of the size of the body. When he enters from a big body to the body of a small one, it happens that he does not enter it with his full size but only partly. Then it will happen that the soul is not complete in the smal1 body.
33. Na ca paryaayaadapyavirodho vikaaraadibhyah
Nor also is there non-contradiction from Paryaayaa; on account of change, etc.
Nor it can be said that the contradiction does not arise, as the self assumes a different condition through contraction and dilatation; because this would imply that the soul is the subject to change, like the pot, etc.
^तथाविध A 1.
