५८ वादावली २१९. अस्त्वनुमानंमेव बाधकं प्रत्यक्षस्येति चेन्न ; प्रत्यक्षविरोधेन प्राप्तमरणावस्थस्य प्रत्यक्षविरोधाक्षमत्वात् । अन्यथा दहनशैत्यानुमानमपि तदुष्णतावगाहिप्रत्यक्षबाधकत्वेन प्रमाणं प्रसज्येत । यदा च प्रत्यक्षं सम बलप्रत्यक्षान्तरेण न बाध्यते, हन्त ! तदा का वार्ता तत्पादोपजीविनो वरा कस्य तर्कस्य तद्वाधकत्वे । २२०. नभोमलिनतामाकलयत्प्रत्यक्षममूतनुमानेन बाधितं दृष्टमिति चेन्न ; तत्राप्याप्तवाक्यादिनैव बाधाभ्युपगमेनासम्प्रतिपत्तेः । 219. If it be said, “ Let inference itself be the sub later of perception,' 10 ; for, (the inference) reduced to the death-state by the contradiction with perception, is incapable of contradicting the perception. Otherwise valid as the sublater of the perception comprehending heat (in fre). And when perception is not sublated by another perception of eual strength, what them, alas! is the talk about the wretch, namely, reasoning which 1ives at the feet of that (perception), being the sublater of that ? 220. If it be said that the perception that appre hends the sky as sullied (by smoke etc.,) is seem to be sub lated by the inference of its being incorporeal, 10 (says the siddhāntin) ; for, even there, since the acceptance of the sublation is solely due to the testimony,of reliable persor15, etc., there is no adrmission (of sublation by inference)
