५४ २०६. कालपरिच्छेदे चानित्यता सादिता त्रिकालसत्यता वाभि प्रेता भवेत् । तथा च कालस्यैतादृशपरिच्छेदायोगेनागतः स एव दुरात्मा व्याघातः । २०७. कुतश्चाकाशादेः कालपरिच्छेदाध्यवसायः ? जडत्वहेतुनेति चेन्न; तस्यापाकृतत्वात्, घटादौ कार्यताप्रयुक्तत्वाञ्च परिच्छिन्नत्वस्य । २०८. यज्जडं तत्कार्यमिति चेन्न ; अविद्यायां व्यभिचारात् । तस्याश्च कार्यत्वेऽनादित्वपरिभाषा परिलुप्येत । तत्कारणस्याभावश्च । defect, ever because of 101-distinction from the pr0 206. And by temporal finitude might be intended being non-eterTal or ' having a beginning' or * 10t being real in all three times (the past, future and the present) ; and thus, because of the impossibility of such a fmitude in respect of time, that same contradic tion of vile nature has come (again) 207. By what (authority) do we determine term poral finitude in respect of ether ? If it be said (that it is) by the probams, inertness, it is not s0 (says the siddhāntin) because it has been refuted, also because the initude in the case of pot, etc., is brought about by (the adjunct) “ being an effect '. 208. If it be said that whatever is imert is an effect, it is not so (says the siddhantin), because of inconstancy in respect of mescience. 'And if that be an effect, there would be the failure of the technical exposition in respect of that (rescience) as beginning 1ess; and there is non-existence of a cause for it.
