४८ १८५ . अत्यन्तासत्यनैकान्त्यञ्च । १८६ . न च तदपि मिथ्येति वाच्यम् । तथा सति रजतादेर सद्विलक्षणत्वप्रतिपादनप्रथासवैयथ्यांपातात् । १८७. न च बाध्यत्वमसतो युज्यते, अप्रतीत्यङ्गीकारात् । नापि तस्यानिवेचनीयत्वम् , तस्य प्रमाणाभावादिति । १८८ . न च जडत्वहेतुरपि निगदितदूषणगणलङ्कने जङ्कालः । तथाहि--किमिदं जडत्वं नाम ? ज्ञानानाधारत्वं वा ? अनात्मत्वं वा ? अज्ञानरूपत्वं वा ? अस्वप्रकाशत्वं वा ? empirical usage, since its establishment is admitted only as superimposed (merely pher1071ernal, thus reguiring neither a psychosis of manas mor intelligence as reffected in that psychosis) : this we have said. 185. There is also non-conclusiveness (of the pro bams) in respect of the absolutely unreal 186 . Nor ca17 it be said that that too is illusory ; for, in that case there is the contir tirge11ce of futility of the effort to predicate the difference fro1in the unreal in respect of silver, etc. 187. Nor does sublatability stand to reason in the case of the unreal, since its 101-cognition is accepted. Nor can there be indeterminability for it, because there is no authority for it (..., indeterminability) 188. The probains “inertness to has not the legs (strong enough) to jump over the adduced group of defects. It is as follows : : what is the meaning of this
