वादावली ९१. घटोऽयम् एतद्धटप्रागभावव्यतिरिक्तानादेर्निवर्तकः; घट त्वात् ; वटान्तरवत् इत्याभाससमानयोगक्षेमत्वात् । ९२. एतेन–विगीतो भ्रमः एतज्जनकाबाध्यातिरिक्तोपादानकः; विभ्रमत्वात् ; सम्प्रतिपन्नवत् इति च निरस्तम् । अनादित्वप्रमानिवत्त्व योर्विरोधाच । ९३. देवदत्तप्रमा देवदत्तगतैतत्प्रमाप्रागभावातिरिक्तानादेर्निवर्तिका न भवति ; प्रमात्वात् ; सम्प्रतिपन्नवत् इति सप्रतिपक्षता च । destroyer of that which (1) is other than the prior non existence of valid cognition located in that (Devadatta) and (2) is beginningless, because it is a valid cognition, 1ike undisputed valid cognition: ', is the authority, no (says the siddhantin) 91 falaciousness with (th1e following inference) ; * This p0t is the destroyer of what is different from the prior it is a p0t, like another pot.' 92. And by this is (the inference) retuted : 'The delusion under dispute has for material cause some thing other than that. which produces it and is un sublatable, because it is a delusion, like the admitted (delusion ).' And (it is s0) because there is conflict between beginninglessness and destruction by valid cognition. 93. There is the (following) counter-probarns , “ Devadatta's valid cognition is 10t the destroyer of that which (1) is other than the prior 10n-existence of
