30 what is inside it, hence these are the well-created (or the wholly-created). It cannot be said that the original form of even these is eternal (and so the objection has Inot been answered), because the immediate original is meant (and not the remote original in the definition of the mot-wholly-created). If this be the case why may not malai and the rest subtle form these categories were called 7104at and s0 on. But they are called simply 2727ti (prim10rdia] matter). (ride s.T.) Some do not admit the very nature of 716ahuat and the rest, still less the said distinction. Saib72टोtit07 is used to point out the opposition to them of very many scriptural texts and these scriptural authorities should be looked for elsewhere. They are not quoted XXI (75-82) If this world other than Vismu, manifold with distinctions such as being and non-being and the like is not self-dependent, on whom does it depend and in what particulars ?To satisfy this expectation the Acarya says as follows : सृष्टिः स्थितिः संहृतिश्च नियमोऽज्ञानबोधने । बंधो मोक्षः सुखं दुःखमावृत्तिज्योतिरेव च । विष्णुनास्य समस्तस्य समासव्यासयोगतः ॥ 7ry4274 } = impelling in action) b0716dh८42 = being bound by prakrti. 17029al=release from b00ndage
