10 belongs to the Supreme Brahman, Vasudeva and to 10 other. (v.P. 6-5-76) Tr.] 'All else is dependent tatद्य0' must be added The commentator next draws attention to other 1mplications of the statement, “The Self-dependent tatu0 is Bhagavān Vispu. Or, if we start by saying that there are two categories it may be understood that, like the Self: dependent category, the dependent tatu0 also is one only. Evidence contradicts such an understanding Moreover it disagrees with the subseguent classification So it is said that category is of two kinds. By this it may be understood that the Self-dependent tatuld also is of many kinds . Hence the present statement, * The Self-dependent fattua is Bhagavan Vismu Or, the Saikhyas and others wh0, accepting two distinct kinds of category, the independent and the dependent, consider 270dld742 (primordial matter) and the like to be independent tatu८ views, this statement is made. I (24-36) by saying (it is of) 'two kinds', it has been indica ted that dependent category has internal diversity. In answer to the question, “THow ?' the author says, भावाभावौ द्विधेतरत् ॥ १॥ [भावाभावौ द्विधा इतरत्] NON-BEING Itarat, the other, i.e. tattou0 dependent. other than the Self
