________________
Chopter IV 133 that cannot be accepted as truth, because it is based on wrong premises. To hold that staat is Tag is pure cye-wash and selfdeception. (75) The reason why fata cannot tell us any truth, is that there is has for an AT = not existing, unreal ) viz. the ETUFITOHT= which means belief in da. Actually in the case of reality there cannot be any ga. When a person knows that there cannot exist any ग्राह्यग्राहकभाव, the अभूताभिनिवेश caused by कार्यकारणTe has no scope. K. bhāsya takes to mean q: H I RAH MATIETIENT ti, so that it supplies : to make the construction less involved. We might take TINAT: as the subject of न जायते, but then याभावं बुद्ध्या would go with अभिनिवेश and it might be objected that that cannot be said to cognise anything. I has the sense of a nominative absolute, and the subject of a và may be different from , or refers to a: in Kárikā 74, or vita: in Kārikā 71. (76) The ATSAATA gas correspond to the three 3943 mentioned in III. 16 ( AETESTETT STAI: ). A GST at JTAT: 1 ... HIHERIAI HEGaragrau #ETAI: 1 fabrica APATI THOTE: TOTETTISTITAT: (K. bhāşya ). When the does not concern itself with these cas, it becomes afin and is not originated. (77) When the farm has become far , the state of the fat remains the same immutable for ever. That zat is the Hrom itself. Prof. Vidhuśekhara admits himself baffled over this Karika, leaves the second half of the Karikā untranslated, and considers the explanation given in the K. bhāşya (farm e r A7स्यानिमित्तस्य चित्तस्येति या मोक्षाख्यानुत्पत्तिः सा सर्वदा सर्वावस्था समा निर्विशेषा या च । पूर्वमध्यजातस्यैवानुत्पन्नस्य चित्तस्य सर्वस्पायस्येत्यर्थः । यस्मात्प्रागपि विज्ञानाञ्चित्तदृश्यं तदृदयं जन्म च तस्मादजातस्य सर्वस्य सर्वदा चित्तस्य समायवानुत्पत्तिः ... narzek: ) as unsatisfactory. His objections are: (1) There is nothing corresponding to or in the first line and the sentence is incomplete, and (2) there is no antecedent to w in the second line. It must be admitted that the construction is an involved one but this is not uncommon with Gauda pada ), but we can easily supply FT to correspond with gr, and take na as referring to f . Because F is nothing but it, and therefore as explained before, ha
