१४ ५४ . वादावली नाद्यः ; अंशे सिद्धसाधनत्वात् । ५. रीत्यन्तरेणानित्यत्वादेरेवोक्तत्वात् । ५६. न द्वितीय: ; नित्यसर्वगतयोः कालाकाशयोस्तादृशबाध प्रतिज्ञाने व्याघातात् । ५७ . का चेयं प्रतिपन्नता नाम ? प्रमाणप्रतिपन्नता ? भ्रान्ति प्रतिपन्नता वा ? ५८. नाद्य: ; प्रमाणप्रतिपन्नस्य त्रिकालाखिलदेशनिषेधप्रति योगितासाधनेऽतिप्रसङ्गात् । particular place and ti710e, or is it t() be the counter correlate of the negation in respect of a]] three times and all places ? 54 , Not the frst, because of (the defect) of the establishment of the established in respect of a part (of the subject). 55. For, it is only 101-eternality etc. that is stated in another mode (as sublatability). 56. Not the second, because there is contradiction in premising that kind of sublatability in respect of the eternal and omnipresent ether (Akāsa) and time. 57. What is this which is called “ being cognis ed'? Is it to be validly cognised or delusively cognised ? 58. Not the first, because in the case of the validly cognised, there is undue extensi011 in establisbing that it is the counter-correlate of the negation in respect of a] three times, and all places.
