towards him, Sarvajhatmamuni's verdict ॐ that Madaxa-prasthana is not Saikaraprasthala and is different to it, leaps up into one's view with added significance. II. In none of on the available authoritative works the advaita systemMandanamisra is identified with Suresvara, while, in many Vedartic works of the Advaita and Dvaita schools, Mangana and Survbara are distinguished as two different advaitinsAs already pointed out, there is sufficient evidence 5 to show that Suresvara himself criticises some of the views put forward by Mandana in his Brahmasiddi. Sarvajiatmamuni and the commentators' on the Sainkspafariraha differentiate Mandana from Suresvara and draw attention to the fact that the former's prasthana is different from Shinkaraprasthana, while the latter closely , follows Sarikara. Prakasatman, in his Wiuarava 3B and Sahdirayea, '$ 1 vindicates the views of Padmapada and Sures-
- ra and criticises Mandana's views and where he quotes
Mandana with approval, he refers to him as the author ot the Brahasil and not as Suresvara. Anandabodha quotes extracts ** from the Brchua asiddh in many places in his Nyaya. Math.randy, accepts "" Mandana's views in some cases and criticises • them in cases where he prefers to adopt Suresvara's views; and Citsukha identifies all these eferences in his commenः tary 'k on the Myagdkarada, but nowhere identifies the author
of the Brahmasidd with the author of the Vrika. On the
16 sati. S. Anand, S.S. No83p. 555, verse Y74
|
जीवन्मुक्तिगतो यदाह भगवान् ससंप्रदायप्रभु |
See footnotes 3x to 45 supra.
See footnote 34 supra
See the commentaries of Agricitpurushtama and Ranatirtha on Sath. 6. Anand. S.S. No. 83 p. 555, verse 74
Pa:Vi•viz. s.s. No. 5, p. ros, lines 4 and 5; see also the relevant portion of the T; Dip Ben. S.S., P. 359, lines 23-24A
SY-Nir: T.S.S., P. 7, vease .
Pa-Vi-Vi, S.S. No. 5, p. 34, lines t7-8.
- yAy. Mak•Ch. .S., P. 31, line 9; p. 234, lines 8-9; p. 236, Ine 4-5.
Setoothote 4, sup=
€pre Bra Sid, Far I, p. 3 with Nyi. Mak. Ch. s.s. pp. 338 to 351. So Ay ak, p. 323, then अnd 4, in which Mandal's riew is discarded.
"Citsukha's mmentary ०a Ny. Malk , pp. 23,134, 456, 29० and 291.
