विकिस्रोतःसम्भाषणम्:प्रबन्धकाः

'प्रबन्धिका'पदनिमित्तम् आवेदनम्

अहं शुभा, आ चतुर्भ्यः वर्षेभ्यः विकिकार्ये निरता अस्मि । संस्कृतविकिस्रोतसः संवर्धनदृष्ट्या अहं प्रबन्धिकारूपेण कार्यं निर्वोढुम् इच्छामि ।

मम योगदानम् अधः द्रष्टुम् अर्हन्ति - शुभा

भवताम् अभिप्रायम् अधः सूचयन्तु इति प्रार्थये । --शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:३८, १४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

चर्चा

@yogesh you need to understand what you are opposing and where should write under what tag. You should move your comments from oppose to discussion and paste it without oppose tag since you are not opposing the candidate. You are opposing Vipin kumar as a voter and you say that his vote should not be counted. He has already removed his name from the list and Puranastudy is a valid account. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १०:१९, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

@Sayant Mahato First of All I want to tell you my name is Yograj. I can see your oppose is very political. You want to prove front of bureaucrats that, if I and @Shubha have oppose, than @Udit also has oppose. That's it. For this reason this voting is going to different side. But I know the root problem behind all this. Therefore I am again clarify that I didn't oppose any person. My point was please don't count Vipin Kumar's vote. Because I had seen in history he had made two supports. 1 Vipin kumar 2. puranstudy. for you and Shubha. If you doing this for bureaucrats, please stop this. I didn't support you but I want you three be admins. Please understand. By the way I had learnt this kind of discussion system from you only. Please see it and end up this opposing game. Please don't tell me that there was not a "चर्चा" section, so I didn't do and etc..... Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) १७:२९, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

Hey! @Yograj you are attacking me personally. I think you should rebuttal me with logic rather making weird allegation. I don't have any problem to accept if I'm wrong. And didn't oppose Udit personally. It maybe seen as political or conspiracy in your eyes but in fact there is none. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०४:४३, १९ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम्--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:१४, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम्--Vaishnavi (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५७, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम्--Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम्----Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२१, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
5. समर्थनम्--Mahalakshmi Prasanna (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५५, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

1. विरोधं -- This Vipin Kumar is not a user of any wiki project. I think that is fake support. Please don't count it. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५०, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

https://sa.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%3A%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80&type=revision&diff=44900&oldid=44896

1. विरोधं -- @Sayant Mahato I have studied Shubha’s contribution. She had changed so many articles with help of HotCat. If I am not using or don’t know HotCat and tell someone that Shubha’s contributions cannot be considered as formal editing. Than someone who uses HotCat very obviously, he will laugh on my logic and intelligence. If AWB edits are not formal editing, than WHY Wikimedia counting that as edits. ? Ex.
2. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/सुभाषितानि_संस्कृते
3. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/सुभाषितावलिः
4. https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/हेमन्तव्रज्या_(सुभाषितरत्नकोशः)

Here she putted category with help of HotCat. There are two other ways to do this work. First is go to edit mode and write [[वर्गः:सुभाषितानि]]. Second is make a list of those pages which should in same category. Run AWB and finish work. Now which is very intelligent? But you only want to bite new comers. You took my comment at different side. My point was 'Udit will use his admin rights and will do creative work. Because he is a person who believe in use of right in proper time.' You took meaning which you wanted from my sentences. And when from your sentences @Yograj took some proper meaning, you are telling that he gets "Personally"? Wow! When you are taking different meaning, than it is "FACT" and for others it is "Personal Attack"? Yograj had told you that he took dissection pattern from you. Why you didn’t respond him for that? Now I understood that you both (Sayant & Shubha) are doing . So I am opposing you both to stop this new comers attack. प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०२:३६, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

1. When @Yograj oppose by mistake, @Titodutta asked him reason. After his clarification @sayant should have told yograj to remove that oppose sing and please put into decision section. I have seen Yograj’s clarification and understood the root reason of Sayant's oppose. We should show the strength of new comers, if someone uses his experience against new comers. I am also opposing both for these. I am adding more that, @Udit Sharma is more capable, than @Shubha. If Udit is not eligible to be an admin, than according to capability of work speed @Shubha is not too. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०४:५७, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

प्राबन्धकावेदनम्

सायन्त माहातो नामधेयोऽहं विकिप्रकल्पेषु कार्यनिरतोऽस्मि । विकिस्रोतसि प्रबन्धकत्त्वम् प्राप्त्यर्थम् अहमिदम् आवेदनं कुर्वन्नस्मि ।

• मम योगदानम्-

https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/विशेषः:योगदानम्/Sayant_Mahato

स्वाभिप्रायान् भवन्तः सूचयन्तु --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) ०७:५५, १४ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

चर्चा

You should move your comments from oppose to discussion and paste it without oppose tag since you are not opposing me as a candidate as per your comment. You are opposing Vipin kumar as a voter and you say that his vote should not be counted. He has already removed his name from the list and Puranastudy is a valid account. --Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२३, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम्--शुभा (सम्भाषणम्) ०५:५९, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम्--Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम्--Narayanan V T (सम्भाषणम्) १०:२५, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम्--Mahalakshmi Prasanna (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५६, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

1. विरोधं -- This Vipin Kumar is not a user of any wiki project. I think that is fake support. Please don't count it. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५०, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC) https://sa.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Wikisource%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%3A%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%80&type=revision&diff=44900&oldid=44896

   सदस्यः:Yograj, I failed to understand what you meant here. Are you talking against the candidate (i.e. Sayant Mahato) or any voter? If you are talking against any voter, that is not a reason to oppose this nomination unless you clarify more. About the vote - should it be counted or not -- the closing admin will surely take it into consideration. Thanks. --Tito Dutta ✉ १३:०५, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

I am not apposing any one Sayant is good editor. In URL you can see puranstudy make a wrong vote. I requested that Please don't count that vote. Now that vote is not there but you can see that mistake in url. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) १३:३८, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

1. विरोधं -- प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०२:३८, २० जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

प्रबन्धकाधिकाराय आवेदनम्

मम नाम उदितः शर्मा । अहं वर्षद्वयेभ्यः संस्कृतविकिपीडियाजाले सक्रियः सदस्यः अस्मि । विकिस्रोतसि प्रबन्धककार्यं कर्तुं मे सज्जता । अतः अत्र प्रबन्धकाधिकाराय निवेदयामि ।

• मम योगदानम् Udit Sharma (सम्भाषणम्) ०६:५४, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

स्वविचारान् उपस्थापयन्तु ।

चर्चा

समर्थनम्

1. समर्थनम् -- In sa.wikipedia Udit's work is very impressive. He had helped me for this issue for improve sa.wikisource. From last several days there are so much vandalism in sa.wikisource and sa.wikipedia. Udit had managed those people and put unwanted articles in delete category. In sa.wikipedia he is the most active person to manage such things. Now he is doing that kind of work here too. He is the most capable person to get this right. NehalDaveND (सम्भाषणम्) ०८:०९, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
2. समर्थनम् -- उदितमहोदयः स्वाधिकारस्य उपयोगः कथं कर्तव्यः इति सम्यक् जानाति । संस्कृतविकिपीडिया-जाले सर्वे अधिकारान् स्थापयितुं तु इच्छान्ति, परन्तु कार्यं तु विरलाः एव कुर्वन्ति । परन्तु निरीक्षकः उदितमहोदयः तत्र स्वदायित्वं योग्यरीत्या अवहत् । अत्रापि एनम् अधिकारं प्राप्य सः तेषाम् अधिकारणां योग्यम् उपयोगं करिष्यति । प्रबन्धकः केवलम् अधिकारः नास्ति, अपि तु तदानुगुणं कार्यम् अपि करणीयं भवति । एतस्य विचारस्य कृते दृढसङ्कल्पी उदितमहोदयः एतस्मै अधिकाराय योग्यतमः । प्रतिमा (सम्भाषणम्) ०८:२२, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
3. समर्थनम् -- Udit Sharma is the most active person is sa.wikipedia, sa.wikisource, WikiMedia, Commence and wikidata. ALL ROUNDER Udit doing good job himself and inspires others too. Yograj (सम्भाषणम्) ०९:५६, १६ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)
4. समर्थनम् -- Puranastudy (सम्भाषणम्) १६ जनवरी २०१६
5. समर्थनम् -- Some times politically we can't prove our hard work, but we must be strong to prove our moral hard work via political stage. The Steve jobs had done lots of hard work for apple. But he couldn't prove that and he had been thrown out from company by other members. After some time he proved his hard work politically too. But that time also his moral hard work bigger than politically proves. I suggest you @Udit Sharma don't loos hope. Your work is intelligent and proper. I am fully agree with @yogrraj. So I don't want to oppose @Sayant Mahato and @Shubha. Because if Sayant is doing this for bureaucrats, than he will understand and be fare for Udit after Yougraj's clarification. Sshihora (सम्भाषणम्) ०३:३९, १९ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)

विरोधः

विरोधं I strongly oppose Udit Sharma's candidature for adminship.
Eligibility:
He has never added a text on wikisource or at the least not even created an index page. The sub pages which has been created by him are just text splitting of Laghu siddhanta kaumudi.
Experience:
He has worked only for three days 12th 13th and 16th of January 2016. 2 days by using AWB which cannot be considered as formal editing. Though his first edit was year before on 30th January 2015, he has not made any significant contribution to wikisource till date.
Efficiency :
I don't think Udit has ever shown efficiency or knowledge on wikisource. He cannot propose for adminship based on his contributions on wikipedia. Wikipedia project is completely different from wikisource. He may be good at helping others on translation work but this is totally irrelevant in wikisource. Pratima accuse others saying that many people apply for adminship for the sake of rights but in reality they won't work and says Udit being an admin would do a lot of work. But without doing any work on wikisource how can one be assumed as a reformer of wikisource ? Therefore I suggest Udit Sharma to do a considerable constructive work on Wikisource before applying for adminship.--Sayant Mahato (सम्भाषणम्) १२:२८, १८ जनवरी २०१६ (UTC)