Apped 831 । p1) ); it.} {7) • been the same fronm the beginning, never having undergone correction until }ho application of the biju, about A.D. 153 ) (P. 22 etc.). And he date of the correction is calculated at least to suggest the suspicion १.6 Muslim xtj«nce in€y have lhad something to do with it. That ७lbserva titm to the improvement of their ५ystem by deductions from observatio. yer 2maheers of such serious karnext with the Hindus that they should have been lead to make sp«h amendments independ. sutfly, if yck to h; ov०५ he most important alteration of which anything like direct proof jik furnishe up bhat, which concerns the prछ. | 1.hte inuxes (note () 1. 9-}} and von here we would ot uviurake |y cortiolently what is the conclusion to be draw) Bull) ugu ।ub Pennail conj®guru. HJne!= }' in t.४ % light, until the 1osition of the Birya-siddhaned in the siddhinta iter: tAry blobal beft untirfor Wh as given it so much greator } rily haun aare enjoyed by the the works of its pon what prior it •e thatk(५, is unknown. There Rae) breaties, like the akalya-Samhitई (ld. not. 1), which egro tin a ial features ; there are yet otlters like the Sorma and Va sishtha Siddhantax ric} are gaid (a. Hote () to vary little from it w}etro one airong bhan all is original—and if any, which w}netbr in: each c:५e the 'lation ix may to co-ordinatim or of Bubordi . at •mtentfor time in ९ ignorant. ()ne thing. however, is certhrunderocith whatever variety may chauructerize the state tradius, there fundamental unit Invir liferree of spond important a compared with their !CBombinnces; the I represent 3830aimlly single systemAnd this by no nels on the kra Bems hich all modern astronomical works may be si{ % {'pre1f system . For the Hindu system is not n of neur: it i8 . e•en tculian method of viewing and inter ¢firmg nature, from whie fer it hand me been movided by some con tr in th। le:t, ) lers badl not he force and originaliby to devinto: it oroughly artificial structure Full of arbitrary assurnptions, ot up. <dlities even which have no foundation natze, and could be in. ycmted by one |B +'e as another, we need only to refer, as instances, to the Yame-work of monktroub chronological priords (i. 14-28)--to the ennnnurl epoch of he sernmmercement of the Iron Age (note to i. 2-84), with its exact or nearly exact (add. note 6) vonjunction of all the planetw-to Ahe form of statinent of the nean motions, yielding rarring com]ols. !nger or shorter intervals—to the aAAump tio of a start Ig-oint for the planets froIn at or near k Piscium (note tb 27 =to flhe reatolutions of the axiles and nodes of the planets (i. 41-44)–to the double system of opicycles (i. B4-88)—to the deter mination of the planetary orbits (ः xii. 80-W), etc. etc. These are plain indications that the Hindu scienco emanated from one sentore; tha& {b (XIS . 1B
